4:9 To Mṅgandiya · 莲华归心开放中文佛学资料库

- suttas - - evening talks - short morning talks - lectures - guided meditations - talk collections - other themes - chants - - - - à¹à¸à¸¢ - Franā§ais - Espaā±ol - - Portuguāªs - Ð ÑÑÑÐºÐ¸Ð¹ - - - Ð£ÐºÑÐ°ÑÐ½ÑÑÐºÐ° Submit Search - Home - Suttas - KN - Sn - Sn 4:9 To Mṅgandiya ## Browse Suttas Go to Sutta Nipṅta index Sn index ## 4:9 Â To Mṅgandiya [Mṅgandiya, a brahman, offers his daughter to the Buddha, who replies:]1 "On seeing [the daughters of Mṅra] —Discontent, Craving, & Passion— there wasnât even the desire for sex. So what would I want with this, filled with urine & excrement? I wouldnât want to touch it even with my foot."2 Mṅgandiya: "If you donât want this gem of a woman, coveted by many kings, then for what sort of viewpoint, habit, practice, life, attainment of [further] becoming do you argue?" The Buddha: "), # Right single quote ('â', I argue for thisâ doesnât occur to one when considering whatâs grasped among doctrines. Looking for what is ungrasped with regard to views,3 and detecting inner peace, I saw." Mṅgandiya: "Sage, you speak of not grasping at any theorized judgments. This ), # Right single quote ('â', inner peaceâ: What does it mean? How is it, by the enlightened, proclaimed?" The Buddha: "He doesnât speak of purity in connection withÂ Â Â Â Â view, learning, knowledge, habit or practice. Nor is it found by a person through lack of view, of learning, of knowledge, of habit or practice.4 Letting these go, without grasping, at peace, independent, one wouldnât long for becoming." Mṅgandiya: "Well, if he doesnât speak of purity in connection withÂ Â Â Â Â view, learning, knowledge, habit or practice. and it isnât found by a person through lack of view, of learning, of knowledge, of habit or practice,5 it seems to me that this teachingâs simply confused, for some assume a purity in terms of —by means of6— a view." The Buddha: "Asking questions dependent on view, youâre confused by the things you have grasped. And so you donât glimpse even the slightest notion [of what I am saying]. Thatâs why you think itâs confused. Whoever supposes ), # Right single quote ('â', equal,â ), # Right single quote ('â', superior,â or ), # Right single quote ('â', inferior,â by that heâd dispute; whereas to one unaffected by these three, ), # Right single quote ('â', equal,â ), # Right single quote ('â', superior,â do not occur. Of what would the brahman say ), # Right single quote ('â', trueâ or ), # Right single quote ('â', false,â with whom would he dispute? With whom would he join in dispute, he in whom ), # Right single quote ('â', equal,â ), # Right single quote ('â', unequalâ are not? Having abandoned home, living free from society, the sage in villages creates no intimacies. Remote from sensuality, not preferring, he wouldnât engage with people in quarrelsome debate.7 Those things aloof from which he should go about in the world: The Nṅga wouldnât take them up & argue for them. As the prickly lotus is unsmeared by water & mud, so the sage, an exponent of peace, without greed, is unsmeared by sensuality & the world. An attainer-of-knowledge isnât measured made proud8 by views or whatâs thought, for he isnât fashioned9 of them. He wouldnât be led by action,10 learning; doesnât reach a conclusion in any entrenchments. For one dispassionate toward perception there are no snares; for one released by discernment, no delusions. Those who grasp at perceptions & views go about clashing in the world." vv. 835–847 Notes 1. This information is taken from SnA. The Sanskrit version of this sutta found in the Divyṅvadṅna provides the same basic information in a narrative much more elaborate than that in SnA. The Sanskrit translation of this sutta found in East Turkestan includes a short prose introduction that agrees in some details with the Divyṅvadṅna narrative, and in others with the SnA narrative. 2. Unfortunately, the sutta does not say what Mṅgandiyaâs daughter had done or thought to deserve such a sharp rebuke. See MNÂ 58. 3. See ANÂ 10:93. 4. Putting the first two sentences of this verse together and making sense of them is the major challenge for anyone trying to translate this poem. The reading given here is based on considerations of both grammar and context. a) First, grammar: The Pali of the first sentence puts the words for "view, learning, knowledge, habit, & practice" in the instrumental case. This case stands for the relationship "by means of" or "because of" but it also has an idiomatic meaning: "in terms of." (To keep the translation neutral on this point, I have translated with the idiom, "in connection with," which can carry both possibilities.) The second sentence puts the words for lack of view, etc., in the ablative case, which carries the meaning "because of" or "from." If we assume that the instrumental case in the first sentence is meant in the sense of "by means of," then we are dealing—as Mṅgandiya asserts—with plain nonsense: The first sentence would say that a person cannot achieve p