l version of any of the poems. Such judgments are inevitably subjective, and reveal more about the interpreter than about the text being interpreted. This point applies even more forcefully to Chinese versions of the Canon than to Sanskrit ones, in that they are linguistically and chronologically even further remote from the Pali than the Sanskrit versions are. 2. On the topic of ancient Indian aesthetic theory and its affect on the Pali Canon, see A. K. Warder, Indian Kṅvya Literature, volumes 1 and 2. 3. For more information on these meters, see A. K. Warder, Pali Metre. 4. See Willard Johnson, Poetry and Speculation of the ṃg Veda. 5. See Jan Gonda, Eye and Gaze in the Veda. - --> - - - -