one is obsessed with. If one is not obsessed with anything, then one is not measured or classified by it in the here and now. In SN 23:2 the Buddha points out that the term "being" applies only where there is craving and passion. The Tathṅgata, freed from craving and passion, is thus not a "being," and so is indescribable in the present, even though he obviously still functions in the present. SN 22:86 elaborates on this point in great detail. Another problem raised by the Commentaryâs explanation for this sutta is how it would define the Tathṅgataâs qualities and character, for what are they composed of aside from aggregates? See also: MN 63; MN 72 ## SN 44:2 = SN 22:86 - --> - - - -