The Brahmṅ Invitation Brahma-nimantanika Sutta (MN 49) · 莲华归心开放中文佛学资料库

- suttas - - evening talks - short morning talks - lectures - guided meditations - talk collections - other themes - chants - - - - à¹à¸à¸¢ - Franā§ais - Espaā±ol - - Portuguāªs - Ð ÑÑÑÐºÐ¸Ð¹ - - - Ð£ÐºÑÐ°ÑÐ½ÑÑÐºÐ° Submit Search - Home - Suttas - MN - MN 49 The Brahmṅ Invitation ## Browse Suttas Go to Majjhima Nikṅya index MN index Show outline show outline ## Outline - (Top) - Introduction const prefersTocHidden = window.sessionStorage.getItem('user-prefers-toc-hidden') ?? window.localStorage.getItem('user-prefers-toc-hidden') ?? false; if (prefersTocHidden) { const tocToggleButton = document.getElementById("tocToggle"); const bookToc = document.getElementById("bookToc"); bookToc.classList.remove("show"); tocToggleButton.setAttribute("aria-expanded", false); tocToggleButton.querySelectorAll("[data-show-text]").forEach(el => { el.setAttribute("data-hide-text", el.innerText); el.innerText = el.getAttribute("data-show-text"); }); } ## The Brahmṅ Invitation Brahma-nimantanika SuttaÂ Â (MNÂ 49) ## Introduction In this sutta, the Buddha faces two antagonists: Baka, a Brahmṅ who believes that his Brahmṅ-attainment is the highest attainment there is; and Mṅra, who wants (1) to keep Baka under his power by allowing Baka to maintain his deluded opinion, and (2) to prevent the Buddha from sharing his awakened knowledge with others. Of the two, Mṅra is the more insidious, a point illustrated by the fact that Mṅra always speaks through someone else and never directly shows his face. (Another interesting point is illustrated by the fact that Mṅra is the source of the demand that one obey a creator god.) In overcoming his antagonists, the Buddha asserts the superiority of his knowledge in two major fashions: through a description of his awakened knowledge and through a display of psychic powers. The Buddha describes his awakened knowledge in a variety of ways: —by identifying Mṅra whenever he possesses an attendant of Bakaâs assembly, —by describing the full extent of Bakaâs power, —by identifying levels of being that Baka does not know, —by describing an awakened consciousness that is not known by means of any of the six senses at all, —by asserting an awareness that avoids delight in both becoming and the quest for non-becoming, and —by asserting that he has abandoned all possible conditions that would lead to further rebirth. Some of these assertions—in particular, the assertion of a consciousness not mediated by any of the six senses—are extremely important Dhamma lessons, which are further explained in the notes. But as the sutta shows, even the Buddhaâs description of these teachings was not enough to win over Baka or the members of his following. They were convinced only when the Buddha then performed a feat of psychic power that (1) even Baka could not fathom and (2) illustrated the Buddhaâs major point. Up to then, in identifying Mṅra and the range of Bakaâs power, the Buddha was in effect saying, "I see you, but you donât see me." With his display of psychic power, in which Brahmṅ and his following could not see him but could hear his voice, he demonstrated his point in such graphic terms that Baka and his following were immediately won over. In this way, the protagonists of this sutta react in a way very different from that of a typical modern reader. We at present, when reading this sutta, may be more impressed with the Buddhaâs explanation of his awakened knowledge than we are with the account of his display of psychic power, for after all, both aspects of the sutta—the description of the Buddhaâs knowledge and the description of his psychic power—are, for us, just that: descriptions. But, for those who witnessed it, his display of power was an undeniable fact that went beyond words. They saw him go beyond their range. Prior to that display, they regarded his claims of knowledge simply as that: mere claims. When he showed, however, that he could perform a miracle that even Baka could not perform, they were forced to concede his superiority. Thus this sutta imparts a lesson often forgotten at present, that the Buddha taught not only by word but also by example, and that some of his examples required a dimension of power that even the gods could not match. Strictly speaking, of course, the Buddhaâs display of power did not prove that he had gone beyond becoming. After all, in becoming invisible to Baka, he may simply have gone to another level of becoming of which Baka was unaware. However, the Buddha correctly surmised that a display of power would subdue the pride of his listeners, awaken a sense of conviction in his attainment, and thus enable them to enter the path of practice. As he states in MNÂ 27, only when one sees the four noble truths—usually a synonym for stream-entry—is oneâs conviction in the Buddhaâs awakening confirmed. Only when one puts an end to oneâs mental effluents does one have firm proof of the Buddhaâs awakening. The Buddha notes in DNÂ 11 that a display of psychic powers can sometimes