The Great Total Unbinding Discourse Mahṅ Parinibbṅna Sutta (DN 16)

- suttas - - evening talks - short morning talks - lectures - guided meditations - talk collections - other themes - chants - - - - à¹à¸à¸¢ - Franā§ais - Espaā±ol - - Portuguāªs - Ð ÑÑÑÐºÐ¸Ð¹ - - - Ð£ÐºÑÐ°ÑÐ½ÑÑÐºÐ° Submit Search - Home - Suttas - DN - DN 16 The Great Total Unbinding Discourse ## Browse Suttas Go to Dīgha Nikṅya index DN index Show outline show outline ## Outline - (Top) - Introduction - [ I ] - [ II ] - [ III ] - [ IV ] - [ V ] - [ VI ] const prefersTocHidden = window.sessionStorage.getItem('user-prefers-toc-hidden') ?? window.localStorage.getItem('user-prefers-toc-hidden') ?? false; if (prefersTocHidden) { const tocToggleButton = document.getElementById("tocToggle"); const bookToc = document.getElementById("bookToc"); bookToc.classList.remove("show"); tocToggleButton.setAttribute("aria-expanded", false); tocToggleButton.querySelectorAll("[data-show-text]").forEach(el => { el.setAttribute("data-hide-text", el.innerText); el.innerText = el.getAttribute("data-show-text"); }); } ## The Great Total Unbinding Discourse Mahṅ Parinibbṅna SuttaÂ Â (DNÂ 16) ## Introduction Nibbṅna originally was the Pali word for the extinguishing of a fire. The Buddha employed it as one of the names of the goal he taught, in light of the way in which the processes of fire were viewed at his time: A burning fire was seen as clinging to its fuel in a state of hot agitation. When going out, it let go of its fuel and reached a state of freedom, cooling, and peace. These were thus the primary associations of this term when applied to the Buddhist goal. Given this understanding of fire, the term nibbṅna apparently was derived etymologically from the negative prefix, nir, plus the root vṅṃa, or binding: unbinding. The associated adjective is nibbuta: unbound. The associated verb, nibbuti: to unbind. Parinibbṅna—total unbinding—carries two meanings in the Canon. On the one hand, it denotes the unbinding that happens at the moment of full awakening, either for a Buddha or for one of his arahant disciples. On the other, it denotes the unbinding that happens when such a person dies and is no longer reborn. In the title of this sutta, the term has this second meaning, centered on the Buddhaâs death. The word mahṅ, "great," in the suttaâs title modifies both "parinibbṅna" and "sutta." In other words, it states both that the sutta is long—itâs the longest in the Pali Canon—and that the Buddhaâs death is the most important parinibbṅna in the Buddhist tradition. The sutta narrates the events of the year leading up to the Buddhaâs parinibbṅna and the weeks immediately following it. In a few instances, most notably the events right before the Buddhaâs passing, the narrative gives a fairly realistic blow-by-blow account of random incidents, but the main body of the sutta shows signs of having been consciously selected and shaped. We know from other passages in the Canon that not all the major events of this period were included here. Ven. Sṅriputta, for instance, appears in Part I of the sutta, but SNÂ 47:13 tells us that he died before the Buddha did, and that the Buddha was at Sṅvatthī when he received the news, yet neither event is included in this narrative. At the same time, the style of the narrative follows many of the conventions of literary prose and poetry in ancient India, aimed at producing an astounding rasa, or emotional savor. Two main concerns seem to have determined the shape of the narrative, concerns that are common to any memorial: the desire (1) to show that the person memorialized was worthy of love and respect, and (2) to indicate the importance of continuing to live by the good traditions that the person established. Both concerns are encapsulated in the event chosen to open the sutta: King Ajṅtasattuâs emotional outburst over his plans to invade the Vajjians, and his request that his chief minister, Vassakṅra, ask for the Buddhaâs advice on the matter. Thereâs a wry irony in depicting a king so spiritually blind as to seek the Buddhaâs advice on plans for war, but the incident makes several serious points at once. To begin with, it points to the fact that the Buddha was respected by even the most highly placed members of society. The Buddhaâs indirect response to the kingâs request ultimately averts a war, showing that he used his influence to admirable effect. However, a knowledge of later events—Vassakṅra and Ajṅtasattu were eventually able to defeat the Vajjians bloodlessly by undermining their good traditions—underlines the fact that good traditions cannot maintain themselves, for there are forces in the world seeking to undo them. The Buddha himself draws the parallel between the good traditions in which he trained the Vajjians—which they failed to maintain—and the good traditions in which he trained the Saṃgha. The point is that even though the Buddha set the Saṃgha on a good footing, the continued life of the Saṃgha requires the continued vigilance of its surviving members. Thus even though the opening