About PoṭṭhapṅdaPoṭṭhapṅda Sutta (DN 9) · 莲华归心开放中文佛学资料库

- suttas - - evening talks - short morning talks - lectures - guided meditations - talk collections - other themes - chants - - - - à¹à¸à¸¢ - Franā§ais - Espaā±ol - - Portuguāªs - Ð ÑÑÑÐºÐ¸Ð¹ - - - Ð£ÐºÑÐ°ÑÐ½ÑÑÐºÐ° Submit Search - Home - Suttas - DN - DN 9 About Poṭṭhapṅda ## Browse Suttas Go to Dīgha Nikṅya index DN index Show outline show outline ## Outline - (Top) - Introduction const prefersTocHidden = window.sessionStorage.getItem('user-prefers-toc-hidden') ?? window.localStorage.getItem('user-prefers-toc-hidden') ?? false; if (prefersTocHidden) { const tocToggleButton = document.getElementById("tocToggle"); const bookToc = document.getElementById("bookToc"); bookToc.classList.remove("show"); tocToggleButton.setAttribute("aria-expanded", false); tocToggleButton.querySelectorAll("[data-show-text]").forEach(el => { el.setAttribute("data-hide-text", el.innerText); el.innerText = el.getAttribute("data-show-text"); }); } ## About Poṭṭhapṅda Poṭṭhapṅda SuttaÂ Â (DNÂ 9) ## Introduction This sutta portrays two modes by which the Buddha responded to the controversial issues of his day. The first mode—illustrated by his contribution to the discussion on the ultimate cessation of perception—was to adopt the terms of the discussion but to invest them with his own meanings, and then to try to direct the discussion to the practice leading to the cessation of suffering & stress. The second mode—illustrated by his treatment of whether the cosmos is eternal, etc.—was to declare the issues as unconducive to awakening, and to refuse to take a position on them. Several other suttas—such as MNÂ 63, MNÂ 72, and ANÂ 10:93—portray the Buddha and his disciples adopting the second mode. This sutta is unusual in its extended portrait of the Buddhaâs adopting the first. Many of the technical terms he uses here—such as the perception of a refined truth, the peak of perception, the alert step-by step attainment of the ultimate cessation of perception, the appropriation of a self—are found nowhere else in the Canon. At the end of the sutta, he describes them as "the worldâs designations, the worldâs expressions, the worldâs ways of speaking, the worldâs descriptions, with which the Tathṅgata expresses himself but without grasping at them." In other words, he picks them up for the purpose at hand and then lets them go. Thus they are not to be regarded as central to his teaching. Instead, they should be read as examples of his ability to adapt the language of his interlocutors to his own purposes. For this reason, this sutta is best read only after you have read other suttas and are familiar with the more central concepts of the Buddhaâs teachings. Of particular interest here is the Buddhaâs treatment of the three "appropriations of a self." The first—the gross self—refers to the ordinary, everyday sense of identifying with oneâs body. The latter two—the mind-made appropriation and the formless appropriation—refer to the sense of self that can be developed in meditation. The mind-made appropriation can result from an experience of the mind-made body—the "astral body"—that constitutes one of the powers that can be developed through concentration practice. The formless appropriation can result from any of the formless states of concentration—such as an experience of infinite space, infinite consciousness, or nothingness. Although meditators, on experiencing these states, might assume that they have encountered their "true self," the Buddha is careful to note that these are appropriations, and that they are no more oneâs true self than the body is. They are oneâs appropriation of a self only for the time that one identifies with them. The Buddha goes on to say that he teaches the Dhamma for the sake of abandoning every appropriation of a self "such that, when you practice it, defiling mental qualities will be abandoned, bright mental qualities will grow, and you will enter & remain in the culmination & abundance of discernment, having known & realized it for yourself in the here & now." *Â *Â * I have heard that on one occasion the Blessed One was staying near Sṅvatthī in Jetaâs Grove, Anṅthapiṃṇikaâs monastery. Now on that occasion Poṭṭhapṅda the wanderer, together with a large following of about 300 wanderers, had taken up residence in the debating hall near the Tiṃṇuka tree in the single-pavilion park of Queen Mallikṅ. Then the Blessed One, early in the morning—having adjusted his lower robe and taking his bowl & outer robe—entered Sṅvatthī for alms. Then the thought occurred to him, "While itâs still too early to go into Sṅvatthī for alms, why donât I go to the debating hall near the Tiṃṇuka tree in the single-pavilion park of Queen Mallikṅ to see Poṭṭhapṅda the wanderer?" So he went to the debating hall near the Tiṃṇuka tree in the single-pavilion park of Queen Mallikṅ. Now on that occasion Poṭṭhapṅda the wanderer was sitting with his large following of wanderers, all making a great noise & racket, discussing many kinds of bestial t