About Migṅsṅlṅ Migṅsṅlṅya Sutta (AN 10:75) · 莲华归心开放中文佛学资料库

- suttas - - evening talks - short morning talks - lectures - guided meditations - talk collections - other themes - chants - - - - à¹à¸à¸¢ - Franā§ais - Espaā±ol - - Portuguāªs - Ð ÑÑÑÐºÐ¸Ð¹ - - - Ð£ÐºÑÐ°ÑÐ½ÑÑÐºÐ° Submit Search - Home - Suttas - AN - AN 10:75 About Migṅsṅlṅ ## Browse Suttas Go to Aṃguttara Nikṅya index AN index ## About Migṅsṅlṅ Migṅsṅlṅya SuttaÂ Â (ANÂ 10:75) On one occasion the Blessed One was staying near Sṅvatthī in Jetaâs Grove, Anṅthapiṃṇikaâs monastery. Then early in the morning, Ven. ṅnanda—having adjusted his lower robe and carrying his bowl & outer robe—went to the house of the female lay follower Migṅsṅlṅ. On arrival, he sat down on a seat made ready. Then the female lay follower Migṅsṅlṅ approached Ven. ṅnanda and, on arrival, having bowed down to him, sat to one side. As she was sitting there, she said to Ven. ṅnanda, "Venerable sir, how on earth should the Dhamma taught by the Blessed One be understood where one who practices celibacy and one who doesnât practice celibacy would both have exactly the same destination in the next life? My father, Purṅṃa, was one who practiced celibacy, living apart, abstaining from sexual intercourse, the vulgar act. When he had died, he was predicted by the Blessed One to be a once-returner, rearising in the company of the Contented (devas). My paternal uncle, Isidatta, did not practice celibacy and was content to live with his wife. And yet when he died, he too was predicted by the Blessed One to be a once-returner, rearising in the company of the Contented (devas). So how on earth should the Dhamma taught by the Blessed One be understood where one who practices celibacy and one who doesnât practice celibacy would both have exactly the same destination in the next life?" "But it was just as the Blessed One predicted, sister." Then Ven. ṅnanda, after receiving alms at the house of the female lay follower Migṅsṅlṅ, got up from his seat and left. Then after his meal, returning from his alms round, Ven. ṅnanda went to the Blessed One. On arrival, having bowed down to him, he sat to one side. As he was sitting there he (related his entire conversation with Migṅsṅlṅ). "But, ṅnanda, who is this Migṅsṅlṅ, foolish, incompetent, blind, with the discernment of the blind?1 And who are these people with knowledge of the course of other individuals? "ṅnanda, these ten individuals are to be found existing in the world. Which ten? [1] "There is the case where one individual is unvirtuous and he doesnât discern, as it has come to be, the awareness-release and discernment-release where that lack of virtue ceases without trace. He is unaccomplished in listening, unaccomplished in wide learning, and has not penetrated (the teachings) in terms of his views. He doesnât gain occasional release.2 At the break-up of the body, after death, he heads for loss, not for distinction. He is one who goes to loss, not one who goes to distinction. [2] "But then, ṅnanda, there is the case where one individual is unvirtuous and yet he discerns, as it has come to be, the awareness-release and discernment-release where that lack of virtue ceases without trace. He is accomplished in listening, accomplished in wide learning, and has penetrated (the teachings) in terms of his views. He gains occasional release. At the break-up of the body, after death, he heads for distinction, not for loss. He is one who goes to distinction, not one who goes to loss. "In this case, ṅnanda, those who are measurers will measure: ), # Right single quote ('â', This one has the same qualities as the other. Why should one of them be base and the other sublime?â That will be for their [the measurers] long-term harm & suffering. "In this case, ṅnanda, the individual who is is unvirtuous and yet discerns, as it has come to be, the awareness-release and discernment-release where that lack of virtue ceases without trace; who is accomplished in listening, accomplished in wide learning, and has penetrated (the teachings) in terms of his views; who gains occasional release, is higher & more sublime than the other one. Why is that? Because the Dhamma-stream carries him along. But who would know this difference aside from a Tathṅgata? "Therefore, ṅnanda, donât be a measurer of individuals. Donât take the measure of other individuals.3 Heâs conceited,4 anyone who takes the measureÂ ofÂ other individuals. I, however, may take the measure of individuals—or one like me. [3] "There is the case where one individual is virtuous and he doesnât discern, as it has come to be, the awareness-release and discernment-release where that virtue ceases without trace. He is unaccomplished in listening, unaccomplished in wide learning, and has not penetrated (the teachings) in terms of his views. He doesnât gain occasional release. At the break-up of the body, after death, he heads for loss, not for distinction. He is one who goes to loss, not one who goes to distinction. [4] "But then, ṅnanda, there is the case where one individual