Voice Ghosa Suttas (AN 2:123–124) · 莲华归心开放中文佛学资料库

- suttas - - evening talks - short morning talks - lectures - guided meditations - talk collections - other themes - chants - - - - à¹à¸à¸¢ - Franā§ais - Espaā±ol - - Portuguāªs - Ð ÑÑÑÐºÐ¸Ð¹ - - - Ð£ÐºÑÐ°ÑÐ½ÑÑÐºÐ° Submit Search - Home - Suttas - AN - AN 2:123–124 Voice ## Browse Suttas Go to Aṃguttara Nikṅya index AN index ## Voice Ghosa SuttasÂ Â (ANÂ 2:123–124) "Monks, there are these two conditions for the arising of wrong view. Which two? The voice of another1 and inappropriate attention. These are the two conditions for the arising of wrong view." "Monks, there are these two conditions for the arising of right view. Which two? The voice of another and appropriate attention. These are the two conditions for the arising of right view." Note 1. The Commentary identifies "voice of another" (parato ghoso) as meaning, in the case of the first sutta, the voice of another person teaching what is not true Dhamma, and in the case of the second sutta, the voice of another person teaching true Dhamma. However, Woodwardâs translation for the PTS renders parato ghoso as "a voice from another world," and in a footnote he interprets it as "clairaudience from another (world)." To summarize his reasoning: If ordinary speech were meant, the word vṅcṅ or vṅcī would have been used instead of ghoso; and if another person were meant, aā±ā±assa or aā±ā±atarassa would have been used instead of parato. Finally, he notes that this passage appears also in MNÂ 43 following a statement of "abnormal powers," which apparently is meant to show that, in context, this statement must refer to the type of psychic knowledge that derives from abnormal powers. There are several problems with this interpretation, the first being that it leaves no room for an event happening many times in the Canon: people gaining right view simply on hearing the words of another person. One scholar has tried to get around this objection, saying that the voice from another world must refer to the voice of the Buddha or to one of the noble disciples who gained awakening on hearing the Buddhaâs own voice. The implication here is that only the words of these two classes of people can inspire right view. This position, however, is disproved by the fact that in Mv.I.23.5 Ven. Sṅriputta, who at that point has not yet met the Buddha, is able to inspire the arising of the Dhamma eye in Ven. Moggallṅna. This passage appears in the long origin story leading up to the rules dealing with ordination, and makes an important point in validating the tradition of ordination: that a person who has not met the Buddha can still inspire right view and even awakening in the mind of another. So the Canon itself disproves both of these otherworldly interpretations of this statement. As for Woodwardâs linguistic arguments: It is hard for a non-native speaker of a dead language to know the reasoning in the mind of a native speaker in that language, but it might have been the case that the Buddha avoided the word aā±ā±assa for "other" because it could have easily been confused for another meaning of aā±ā±assa, "pertaining to the knowledge of an arahant." As for vṅcī and aā±ā±atarassa, neither of them fits the context. Vṅcī is a stem-form used in compounds, and aā±ā±atarassa means "of a certain person." This leaves vṅcṅ, "statement" as a possible alternative, but perhaps the Buddha chose ghoso to leave room for the possibility that there are times when one can bring another to his/her senses simply by clearing oneâs throat. Finally, concerning the passage from MNÂ 43: This sutta is a long series of questions and answers that abruptly switch from topic to topic, so itâs hard to say that the sutta provides a clear sense of context for any of its statements. That said, however, itâs not even the case that this passage follows on a statement about abnormal powers. It actually follows on two questions about discernment, which in turn follow on a discussion of the formless jhṅnas—apparently the "abnormal powers" mentioned by Woodward—and as ANÂ 9:36 and MNÂ 140 show, itâs possible to develop discernment based on these attainments without psychic powers. - --> - - - -